← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/6109/2016disposed off

Kanwarlal Sinha v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2016-11-08Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No.6109 of 2016 Kanwarlal Sinha, son of late Shri Brijlal Sinha, aged about 41 years, posted as Dog Handler, resident of Shanti Nagar, Kanker, District Kanker (CG).

---- Petitioner

Versus

1.

State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Home Department, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, Police Station Rakhi, District Raipur (CG).

2.

The Director General of Police, Chhattisgarh Arms Force, Police Headquarter, Raipur (CG).

3.

The Inspector General of Police, Bastar Zone, Jagdalpr, District Bastar (CG).

4.

The Additional Director General of Police, Chhattisgarh Arms Force, Police Headquarter, Raipur (CG).

5.

The Superintendent of Police, Kanker, Office of Superintendent of Police, Kanker, District Kanker (CG).

--- Respondents For Petitioner : Shri D.N. Prajapati, Advocate For State : Shri Dhiraj Wankhede, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 08/11/2016 (1) Heard.

(2) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent No.3 i.e. Inspector General of Police, Bastar Zone, Jagdalpur has recommended to the respondent No.4 i.e. Additional Director General of Police, Chhattisgarh Arms Force, Raipur to promote to the petitioner

on the post of Head Constable under Regulation 70 (A) of Chhattisgarh Police Regulations Act, but no decision has been taken by the said authority till this date.

(3) In view of above, respondent No.-4 i.e. Additional Director General of Police, Chhattisgarh Arms Force, Raipur is directed to consider and take a decision on the case of the petitioner in accordance with law preferably within a period of two months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

(4) With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

(5) It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the authority concerned would be at liberty to decide the case of the petitioner in accordance with law. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge L/-