Smt. Sita Devi Pandey v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 2838 of 2016 • Smt. Sita Devi Pandey W/o Shri Chandra Shekhar Pandey, Aged About 55 Years R/o Boir Dadar, Ward No. 48, House No. 188, Main Road Boirdadar, Raigarh, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Thana Naya Raipur, Tah & Distt. Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)
2. The Collector, Collectorate, Raigarh, Thana And Distt. Raigarh, (Chhattisgarh)
3. The Tahsildar, ( Tahsil Raigarh), Office Of Tahsildar, Distt. Raigarh (Chhattisgarh)
4. The Naib Tahsildar ( Tahsil Raigarh), Office Of Tahsildar, Distt. Raigarh, (Chhattisgarh)
5. Mahesh Shukla, S/o Suraj Pal,
6. Santosh Yadav, S/o Vikram Yadav,
7. Lalchand, S/o Vikram Yadav,
8. Goverdhan, S/o Vikram Yadav,
9. Lalaram, S/o Vikram Yadav, Respondent No.5 to 9 are R/o Boirdadar, Raigarh, Thana Chakradharnagar, Tahsil & Distt. Raigarh, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents For Petitioner :
Shri NK Malviya, Advocate For Respondents-State :
Shri Shashank Thakur, GA for the State Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 18/11/2016
1. The impugned order has been passed by the Collector, Raigarh, in exercise
of its revisional power under Section 50 of the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code, 1959 (for short 'the Code, 1959').
2. The petitioner has alternative remedy of preferring revision application before the Board of Revenue under the provisions of the Code, 1959.
3. In view of the availability of statutory alternative remedy, this Court is not inclined to entertain this writ petition. If the petitioner moves revision application within a period of one month from today, the revisional authority shall consider and decide the revision after hearing all the parties concerned, at the earliest, preferably within a period of three months from the date of submission of revision application.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Judge Prashant Kumar Mishra Ashu