High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPCR/344/2016dismissed

Moharlal v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-01-17Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Order Sheet W.P.(CR). No. 344 of 2016 Moharlal, S/o. Late Devsai, Aged About 55 Years Caste Rajwar, Occupation Agriculturist, R/o. Village Kanakpur, Post Silfili, P. S. Kanakpur, Tehsil Surajpur, Civil & Revenue District Surajpur (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department Of Home (Police), Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Revenue & Civil District Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

2. Director General Of Police, Raipur, Revenue & Civil District Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

3. Collector, Surajpur, Revenue & Civil District Surajpur (Chhattisgarh)

4. Superintendent Of Police, Surajpur, Revenue & Civil District Surajpur (Chhattisgarh)

5. Station House Officer Jainagar, Civil & Revenue District Surajpur (Chhattisgarh)

6. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Surajpur, Revenue & Civil District Surajpur, Chhattisgarh.

7. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Surajpur, Revenue & Civil District Surajpur (Chhattisgarh)

8. Assistant Internal Account Audit And Taxation Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Surajpur, Revenue & Civil District Surajpur (Chhattisgarh)

9. Anil Singh, Sarpanch Of Gram Panchayat Kanakpur, Post Silfili, P.S. Jainagar, Tehsil Surajpur, Revenue & Civil Dsitrict Surajpur (Chhattisgarh) 10.Anusuiya, Posted As Rojgar Sahayak Of Gram Panchayat Kanakpur, Post Silfili, P.S. Jainagar, Tehsil Surajpur, Revenue & Civil District Surajpur, (Chhattisgarh) 11.Tapeshwar, S/o Ramprasad, R/o Village Kanakpur, Post Silfili, P.S. Jainagar, Tehsil Surjpur, Revenue & Civil District Surjapur, (Chhattisgarh) 12.Ramnarayan, S/o Roopsai, R/o Village Kanakpur, Post Silfili, P.S. Jainagar, Tehsil Surjpur, Revenue & Civil District Surjapur, (Chhattisgarh) ----Repondents 17/01/2017 Mr. Rishi Sahu, counsel for the petitioner.

Mr. Anupam Dubey, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the State.

Heard.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition has become infructous and seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the instant writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

It is ordered as prayed for.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructous.

Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge balram