High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/4557/2021disposed off

Ajijul Rahman Ansari v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2021-08-31Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 4557 of 2021

1. Ajijul Rahman Ansari S/o Late Ali Hasan Aged About 57 Years Presently Working On The Post Headmaster At Girls Middle School Banja, Block Bhaiyathan District Surajpur Chhattisgarh.

---Petitioner(s)

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Director Directorate Of Public Education Indrawati Bhawan, New Raiur District Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. The District Education Officer Surajpur District Surajpur Chhattisgarh

4. Block Education Officer Bhaiyathan District Surajpur Chhattisgarh

5. Satpal Thakur Working On The Post Of Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Middle School Banja Block Bhaiyathan District Surajpur Chhattisgarh ---Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri AN Pandey, Advocate.

For Respondent State :

Shri Suyash Dhar, Panel Lawyer.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 31.08.2021

1. The grievance of petitioner in the present writ petition is the appointment of respondent No.5 as Circle In-charge of Circle Resource Center, Bajna, Block Bhaiyathan, District Surajpur.

2. According to petitioner, he is much senior to respondent No.5 and therefore he should have been made Circle In-charge of Circle Resource Center, Banja on account of his seniority. According to petitioner, the appointment of respondent No.5, a person who is much junior to the petitioner, is contrary to the circular issued by the State Govt. on 04.08.2011 and 29.01.2020, both of which are still holding the filed.

3. Given the said nature of dispute, let the petitioner make an appropriate detailed representation to the respondents 2 to 4 within a period of two weeks from today and the respondents 2 to 4 in turn shall consider the representation of petitioner within a further period of 45 days from the date of receipt of representation of petitioner. While deciding the same, the

-2respondents 2 to 4 are expected to firstly consider the seniority of the petitioner and also verify the two circulars dated 04.08.2011 and 29.01.2020 issued by the respondent State so far as granting of charge is concerned.

4. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge inder