Smt. Hansa David v. Smt. Arman Bee
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (227) No. 944 of 2017 Smt. Hansa David, wife of Shri S. David, aged about 38 years, resident of H.I.G. -78, Borsi Vistar (Extension), Post Office-Borsi, Tahsil & District - Durg (C.G.) ----Petitioner/Defendant No.1
Versus
1. Smt. Arman Bee, wife of late Chand Khan, aged about 55 years,
2. Usman Khan, son of lat Chand Khan, aged about 30 years,
3. Firoz Khan, son of late Chand Khan, aged about 27 years,
4. Smt. Fatma Bee, wife of Ramjan Khan, aged about 28 years, 5.
Sarfaraz Khan, son of Ramjan Khan, aged about 28 years, No. 1 to 5 are resident of Street No. 3, Berpara, Kasaridih, Durg, Tahsil & District- Durg (C.G.) (Plaintiffs) 6.
Smt. Mehatrin Bai, wife of Kumar Chandrakar, aged about 60 years, resident of Village Belgrand, Post- Belgrand, Tahsil & District - Mahasamund (C.G.) 7.
Smt. Gayatri, wife of Anandram (now dead), through Legal Heirs:- 7(a) Ramesh Chandrakar, son of Anandram Chandrakar, aged about 40 years, 7(b) Devendra Chandrakar, son of Anand Ram Chandrakar, aged about 38 years, 7(c) Lata Chandrakar, daughter of Anand Ram Chandrakar, aged about 36 years, 7(d) Manish Chandrakar, son of Anand Ram Chandrakar, aged about 32 years 7(e) Asha Chandrakar, daughter of Anand Ram Chandrakar, aged about 34 years, 7(f) Nisha Chandrakar, daughter of Anand Ram Chandrakar, aged about 30 years, 7(g) Heena Chandrakar, daughter of Anand Ram Chandrakar, 7(h) Chitralekha Chandrakar, daughter of late Girjashankar Chandrakar,
8. Girjashankar, son of Yashwant Chandrakar, aged about 30 years, permanent resident of Village - Hanoda, Post-Purai, Tahsil & District Durg (C.G.) at present resident of near Railway Line, Borsi Bhatha, Borsi, M.P. Housing Board Colony, Borsi, Tahsil & District - Durg (C.G.)
9. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Collector, Durg, District - Durg (C.G.) {Defendants} ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Kapil Maini, Advocate.
For Respondent No. 9 : Mr. R.K. Jaiswal, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 05/02/2019 (1) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that with the passage of time, this petition has become infructuous.
(2) Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge D/-