Guddu Ram Nureti v. The State Of Chhattisgarh

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4933 of 2019 Guddu Ram Nureti S/o Dhoba Nureti, Aged About 31 Years, R/o R.E.S. Colony (Room No. 5), Narayanpur, Tehsil And District Narayanpur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. The State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, New Raipur, Police Station Rakhi, Revenue And Civil District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Director Panchayat, Department Of Directorate Panchayat, Indravati Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Collector, District Narayanpur, Office Of The Collectorate, District Narayanpur, Chhattisgarh

4. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Narayanpur, Office Of The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Narayanpur, Tehsil And District Narayanpur, Chhattisgarh

5. Shantu Ram Sori S/o Faguram Sori, Aged About 34 Years, Working As A Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Sonpur, Block Narayanpur, Tehsil And District Narayanpur, Chhattisgarh ----Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Rupesh Shrivastava, Advocate.

For State :

Mr. Arvind Dubey, P.L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 08/07/2019

-21. The challenge in the present writ petition is to the order passed by the respondents in granting appointment to respondent no.5 as Secretary Panchayat, Zila Panchayat, Narayanpur.

2. The contention of the counsel for the petitioner is that immediately after the order of appointment dated 23.02.2018 issued in favour of respondent no.5 the petitioner had moved an objection/representation before the respondents 2 to 4. Though it is over one year from the date the representation was filed yet the respondents till date have not taken a decision on the objection/representation made by the petitioner.

3. Given the limited grievance that the petitioner has, this Court is of the opinion that ends of justice would meet if the respondents 2 to 4 are directed to take a decision on the objection/representation that the petitioner has filed against the appointment of respondent no.5. Let the respondents 2 to 4 take an appropriate decision at the earliest preferably within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. It shall be the responsibility of the petitioner to apprise the respondents 2 to 4 so far as the order passed by this Court is concerned.

4. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Khatai