← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/4562/2018disposed off

Vivek Sharma (Vaishnav) v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-07-13Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 4562 of 201 Vivek Sharma (Vaishnav) S/o Late Ashok Kumar Vaishnav, Aged About 30 Years, R/o 29/287, Mansha Devi Gali, Raja Ki Mandi, Agra, P.S. Loha Mandi, Tahsil and District Agara (Uttar Pradesh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Health Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Collector, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

3. Chief Medical and Health Officer, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

4. Block Medical Officer, Masturi, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For State/Petitioner :

Shri C. K. Kesharwani, Advocate For Respondent/State :

Shri Majid Ali, Dy. Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 13/07/2018 The claim of the petitioner is for grant of compassionate appointment.

2.

When at the first instance the petitioner had moved an application for grant of compassionate appointment, he was intimated by respondent no.3 that he should produce a succession certificate as there are more than one claimants. The petitioner thereafter obtained a succession certificate from

the competent Court of law which stood decided vide order dated 24.06.2017. Thereafter on the basis of succession certificate the petitioner again moved an application before respondent no.3 for reconsidering his claim for compassionate appointment which the respondent no.3 on an earlier occasion vide Annexure P-1 had assured for reconsideration. 3.

Given the nature of dispute and the documents enclosed with the writ petition, this Court does not intend to keep the petition pending. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no.3 to consider and decide the claim of the petitioner so far as grant of compassionate appointment is concerned in the light of the letter dated 04.08.2014 issued by him and the succession certificate received by the petitioner on 24.06.2017 as expeditiously as possible preferably within an outer limit of 60 days from the date of presentation of the certified copy of this order. It shall be the responsibility of the petitioner to bring to the notice of respondent no.3 so far as the order passed by this Court is concerned. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) JUDGE Bhola