Santosh Kumar Singh @ Golu Banjara v. State Of Chhattisgarh

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Order Sheet M.Cr.C. No. 6350 of 2021 Santosh Kumar Singh @ Golu Banjara S/o Kanwar Singh Aged About 29 Years R/o Village Pandripara, Police Station And Tahsil Udaypur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh. ---- Applicant

Versus

State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Udaypur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondent 23/08/2021 Shri Jitendra Shrivastava, Advocate for the applicant. Shri Alok Nigam, G.A. for the State.

Shri Anil Kumar Verma, Advocate for the complainant/ objector. Learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to revive the same after examination of the prosecutrix.

With the aforesaid liberty, this M.Cr.C. is dismissed as withdrawn.

Learned counsel for the complainant has requested to return all the certified copies of the documents alongwith the application. Registry is directed to return the certified copies of the documents to counsel for the objector.

Sd/- (Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant) Judge Nimmi

Page No.1 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CRMP No. 895 of 2021 • Santosh Kumar Singh @ Golu Banjara, S/o Kanwar Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village Pandripara, Police Station and Tahsil Udaypur, District-Surguja, Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

• State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Udaypur, District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondent _________________________________________________________ For Petitioner :

Mr. Jitendra Shrivastava, Advocate.

For Respondent :

Mr. Alok Nigam, Govt. Advocate.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant Order on board 06/09/2021

1. Heard on application under Section 482 CrPC has been preferred praying modification of the order dated 23.8.2021 passed in MCRC No.6350/2021.

2. It is submitted by counsel for petitioner, that applicant had not prayed for the liberty as mentioned in the impugned order, therefore, the same may be deleted and applicant be granted liberty to file fresh application.

3. After perusing the impugned order, the prayer made in this application is allowed. "The liberty to revive the application after examination of prosecutrix" as mentioned in the order dated 23.8.2021 in MCRC No.6350/2021 shall not be read as it is hereinafter, instead of that it should be read as "liberty is granted to the applicant to file fresh application".

Page No.2

4. A copy of this order be made part of MCRC No.6350/2021. Sd/- (Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant) Judge Nisha