← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/1915/2018disposed off

Ram Charan Sahu v. The State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-07-13Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 1915 of 2018 Ram Charan Sahu S/o Late Shri Jogiram Sahu, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Village Bharari (Wia Ganiyari) Police Station Kota, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. The State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Water Resources, Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya New Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. The Collector Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

3. The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) / Land Acquisition Officer, Kota District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

4. The Executive Engineer, Water Resources Division Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

5. Executive Engineer, Water Resources (Salkha Division Project Minor Cannel Construction) Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

6. The Executive Engineer, Water Resources Division Kota District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

7. Isak Mohammad S/o Late Jor Mohammad, Aged About 56 Years, R/o Village Kamitar, Police Station Kota Tahsil Takhatpur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Vipin Tiwari, Advocate.

For Respondents / State : Mr. Arun Sao, Dy. Advocate General Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 13/07/18 1.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that respondent No. 3 - Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue) has not considered the letter dated 29.03.2017 issued by respondent No. 2 - Collector, Bilaspur regarding payment of difference amount and rehabilitation amount to the petitioner till this date.

2.

Prayer appears to be fair and reasonable.

3.

Be that as it may, the respondent No. 3- Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue)/ Land Acquisition Officer, Kota District Bilaspur is directed to consider and decide the case of the petitioner for payment of difference amount and rehabilitation amount expeditiously preferably within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 4.

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

5.

It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka