← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPPIL/69/2018dismissed

Umesh Sharma v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-08-30Hon'Ble The Chief Justice,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR W.P(PIL) No.69 of 2018 Umesh Sharma S/o Ramawatar Sharma, Aged About 53 Years R/o New Baradwar (Muktaraja), Tahsil Sakti, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Public Works Department, New Raipur, Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. National Highway Authority Of India Through Chairman National Highway Authority G - 5 And 6, Sector 10, Dwarika, New Delhi., District : New Delhi, Delhi

3. Engineer In Chief National Highway Authority Sirpur Bhavan, Near Kali Mandir, Via Governor House Road, Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

4. Executive Engineer National Highway, Korba Road, Champa, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

5. Collector, Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh., District : JanjgirChampa, Chhattisgarh

6. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Sakti, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

7. Sub Divisional Officer P.W.D. (N.H.) Champa Division, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri HV Sharma, Advocate.

For State/Respondents No.1 & 3 to 7:

Shri YS. Thakur Addl. Advocate General.

For Respondent No.2:

Shri Navin Bhakta, Advocate on behalf of Smt Fouzia Mirza, Advocate.

Hon'ble The Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal Order on Board Per Ajay Kumar Tripathi , Chief Justice 30/08/2018 1.

Heard.

2.

Since the grievances raised by the Petitioner can be agitated by the aggrieved persons individually, therefore, this Public Interest Litigation will not be used as a methodology for some kind of gain which the Petitioner would like to make.

3.

The same is dismissed.

4.

In view of above, IA No.2/2018, an application for exemption from filing the security amount and IA No.3/2018, an application for waiver of the Locus Standi Rule stand dismissed.

Sd/- Sd/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi) (Sanjay Agrawal) CHIEF JUSTICE JUDGE Priya