← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/2162/2019dismissed

Sunil Kumar Jindal v. Chhattisgarh State Power Generation Company Limited,

2019-11-07Hon'Ble The Chief Justice,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 2162 of 2019 Sunil Kumar Jindal S/o Shri Hanuman Prasad Jindal Aged About 42 Years House No. 54, Krishna Vihar Colony, Raigarh District Raigarh Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. Chhattisgarh State Power Generation Company Limited, Through Its Managing Director, Shed No. 2, Vidyut Seva Vhawan Parisar, Dagania, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. The Chief Engineer Civil Project 1 CSPGCL Shed No. 2, Vidyut Seva Vhawan Parisar, Dagania, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. -----Respondents For Petitioner :

Ms. S. Harshita on behalf of Shri Sandeep Singh, Advocate.

For Respondents :

Shri K.R. Nair, Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri PR Ramachandra Menon, Chief Justice & Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Judgment on Board Per PR Ramachandra Menon, CJ 07.11.2019

1. The petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayers :- "10.1 To kindly call the entire record of the impugned tender process.

10.2 To kindly quash the impugned tender No.MDO/CSPGCL-Transportation/19-20/ET/1, Dated 04.06.2019 issued by the Chief Engineer (Civil Project I), CSPGCL Raipur and further direct to issue a fresh tender thereby incorporation reasonable eligibility criteria. 10.3 To kindly make any other order that may be deemed fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case including awarding of the costs to the petitioner.

2. The learned counsel representing the respondents submits that the grievance projected by the petitioner no longer survives, insofar as, the tender under challenge has already been cancelled as per the

proceedings dated 31.10.2019. It is stated that the respondents will be floating a fresh tender and it will be open for the petitioner to participate in the proceedings, if he is qualified as per the terms of the tender.

3. In view of the turn of events, nothing survives to be considered or adjudicated by this Court. The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.

Sd/- Sd/- (PR Ramachandra Menon) (Parth Prateem Sahu) Chief Justice Judge Pawan