High Court Of ChhattisgarhCRA/660/2020withdrawn

Vinod Jaiswal & ANR. v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2021-02-16Hon'Ble Shri Justice Gautam Chourdiya2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CRA No. 660 of 2020

1. Vinod Jaiswal, S/o Shyamnarayan Jaiswal, aged about 38 Years, R/o Bade Kalua, Police Station Khadgawan, District Koriya Chhattisgarh.

2. Vijendra Kumar Sidar, S/o Ramu Sidar, aged about 21 Years, Caste - Binjhiya, R/o Bade Kalua, Police Station Khadgawan, District Koriya Chhattisgarh.

----Appellants

Versus

• State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Station House Officer, District Koriya Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondent For Appellants Shri Rahil Arun Kocher, Advocate.

For State Shri Vimlesh Bajpai, Government Advocate.

For Objector Shri Soumitra Kesharwani, Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam Chour Order on Board 16/02/2021

1. This appeal by the accused/appellants under Section 14-A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 is directed against the order dated 28.08.2020 passed by the Special Judge, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Koriya, Baikunthpur, C.G., refusing to allow his regular bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The appellant has been arrested in connection with Crime No.04/2020 for the offence punishable under Sections 363, 376(2)(n), 323, 506, 34 of Indian Penal Code, under Sections 3(2)(v) & 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes and

Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and under Sections 4 & 6 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 and registered at Police Station AJAK Baikunthpur, District Koriya, C.G.

2. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that he does not want to prosecute this appeal and seeks to withdraw the same with liberty to file appropriate application before the appropriate Bench. However, he prays for return of certified copy of the impugned order.

3. Permission granted.

4. Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

5. Registry is directed to return the certified copy of the impugned order to the counsel for the appellants on his furnishing true authenticated Xerox of the same.

Sd/- Gautam Chourdiya Judge Akhilesh