Ram Bai Yadav v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CRA No. 797 of 2020 1.

Ram Bai Yadav Wife Of Pancham Yadav, Aged About 35 Years, Resident Of Badna, Police Station Kukdur, District Kabirdham (C.G.).

---- Appellant

Versus

1.

State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Station House Officer, Police Station Kukdur, District Kabirdham (C.G.).

---- Respondent For Appellant :

Mr. Sudhir Kumar Verma, Advocate.

For Respondent/State : Mr. Vimlesh Bajapi, Govt. Advocate.

Hon'ble Justice Shri Gautam Chourdiya Order on Board 18/02/2021 1) This appeal by the accused/appellant under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 is directed against the order dated 07/09/2020 passed by the Special Judge (Atrocities Act), Kabirdham (C.G.), refusing to allow his regular bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The appellant is in jail since 30/06/2020 in connection with Crime No. 68/2020 for the offence punishable under Sections 376, 506, 34 of IPC, under Section 4 & 6 of POCSO Act and under Section 3 (2)(v)(d) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and registered at Police Station Kukdur, District Kabirdham (C.G.).

2) Learned counsel for the appellant submits that he does not want to prosecute this appeal and seeks to withdraw the same with liberty to file appropriate application before the appropriate Bench. Further he prays for return of certified copy of the impugned order. 3) Counsel for the State has no objection to the above prayer.

4) Permission granted.

5) Accordingly, the Criminal Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.

6) Registry is directed to return certified copy of the impugned order to the Counsel for the appellant on his furnishing true authenticated xerox of the same.

-Sd/- (Gautam Chourdiya) Judge Chandrakant