High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/4058/2020disposed off

Anil Kumar Chandrakar v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2020-10-13Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 4058 of 2020 • Anil Kumar Chandrakar S/o Shri Hanuman Prasad Chandrakar Aged About 45 Years R/o Village And Post - Jairam Nagar, Tahsil - Masturi, Police Station - Masturi, Distt. Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Police Station And Post - Rakhi, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District - Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

2. Development Commissioner Office Of Development Commissioner, Department Of Panchayat, Indravati Bhawan, Block-1, Ground Floor, Room No. 43, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, Distt. Raipur (Chhattisgarh),

3. Chief Executive Officer (Ceo) Zila Panchayat, Surguja, Distt. Surguja (Chhattisgarh)

4. Chief Executive Officer (Ceo) Janpad Panchayat, Lakhanpur, Distt. Surguja (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Abhishek Pandey, Advocate For State :

Mrs. Richa Shukla, Dy. G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 13.10.2020

1. Heard

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was initially appointed on 22.02.2014 as Assistant Development Extension Officer in the Department of Panchayat and Rural Development and was posted in Janpad Panchayat, Lakhanpur, Distt. Surguja (C.G.). Subsequently, he was subjected to departmental enquiry and the

departmental enquiry, eventually ordered, was passed on 09.07.2019 (Annexure P/2) wherein the probation period of the petitioner was directed to be extended for a period of six months. However, despite six months have been passed, no confirmation order has been issued to the petitioner, therefore the petitioner may be given a liberty to make a representation to the Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Surguja i.e. respondent No. 3 so that the confirmation order of the petitioner may be passed.

3. Considering the fact that since the only limited prayer has been made by the petitioner to make a representation to the respondent No. 3, it is directed that the petitioner shall make a representation before the respondent No. 3 i.e. Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Surguja within a period of four weeks and if such representation is made, the same shall be decided decided within a further period of 90 days from the date of receipt of such representation.

4. With the aforesaid direction/ observation, the writ petition stands disposed off.

Sd/- Goutam Bhaduri Judge Vishakha