Padam Kumar v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 1770 of 2013

1. Padam Kumar S/o Jeevan Ram Patel Aged About 35 Years R/o Village Gandrachuwa, Post Kanakvira, Ps Sarangarh, Civil & Revenue Distt Raigarh, Cg ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department, Capital Complex Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Distt Raipur, Cg

2. Madhyamik Shiksha Mandal C.G. Raipur, Through Its Secretary, Distt Raipur, Cg

3. Madhyamik Shiksha Mandal, Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal, Through Its Secretary, Distt Bhopal, Mp

4. District Education Officer Raigarh, Distt Raigarh, Cg ---- Respondent For Petitioner Shri Sunil Sahu, Advocate For Respondent/State of CG Ms. K. Tripti Rao, PL For Respondent No.2 Shri Manoj Paranjape, Advocate For Respondent No.3 Shri R.S. Patel, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 22/12/2016

1.

At the very outset, learned counsel for the parties would jointly and fairly submit that the matter in issue is squarely covered by the order dated 20.06.2016 passed by this Court in WPC No.1681 of 2015 (Monika Sahu Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others) and other connected petitions i.e. WP No.188 of 2005, WPC Nos.32 of 2014, 473 of 2015, 768 of 2015, 1341 of 2014, 1740 of 2015, 1947 of 2015, 1534 of 2012 and 1536 of 2012. They would pray that this writ petition may also be decided in terms of Monika Sahu (supra).

2.

In view of the above joint statement made, the writ petition is dismissed in terms of the order passed in Monika Sahu (supra) and other connected writ petitions i.e. WP No.188 of 2005, WPC Nos.32 of 2014, 473 of 2015, 768 of 2015, 1341 of 2014, 1740 of 2015, 1947 of 2015, 1534 of 2012 and 1536 of 2012, subject to the liberty reserved in favour of the petitioners for filing a suit.

3.

A copy of the order dated 20.06.2016 passed in Monika Sahu (supra) be made a part of this order.

Sd/- Judge (Prashant Kumar Mishra) Gowri