High Court Of ChhattisgarhMCRC/6580/2021withdrawn

Laxminarayan Nagesh v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2021-09-03Hon'Ble Shri Justice Gautam Chourdiya2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR (Proceedings through Video Conferencing) MCRC No. 4819 of 2021 • Sampat Patel, S/o Shri Vedram Patel, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village Jamhar, P.S. and Tehsil Pithora, District- Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh. Moblie No. 8889734278. ---- Applicant

Versus

• State of Chhattisgarh, Through- Station House Officer, Urla Revenue and Civil District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ---- Non-Applicant MCRC No. 6035 of 2021 • Ramakant Mishra, S/o Devnarayan Mishra, Aged About 27 Years,R/o Near Anugrah Building, Godwara, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ---- Applicant

Versus

• State of Chhattisgarh, Through- Station House Officer, Police Station Urla Raipur, Civil and Revenue District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

---- Non-Applicant MCRC No. 6580 of 2021 • Laxminarayan Nagesh, S/o Janakram Nagesh, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Village - Kulhadighat, Post - Jidar, Thana - Mainpur, District - Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh.

Present Address:- Bazar Chowk, House of Khummu Sahu, Sarora, Thana - Urla, Tahsil and District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ---- Applicant

Versus

• State of Chhattisgarh, Through- Urla, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ---- Non-Applicant For Applicants : Shri Surfaraj Khan, Shri Rekhraj Baghel & Shri Devershi Thakur, Advocates For Non-Applicant/State : Shri Priyanshu Gupta, Panel Lawyer

Hon'ble Justice Shri Gautam Chourdiya Order on Board 03.09.2021

1) Since all these cases arise out of same crime number, they are being disposed of by this common order.

2) The applicants have preferred these applications under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, as they were arrested in connection with Crime No. 154/2021 for the offence punishable under Section 379, 427, 435, 120-B, 34 of IPC, registered at Police Station- Urla, District- Raipur (C.G.).

3) After arguing for sometime, learned counsel appearing for the applicants seeks to withdraw these applications with liberty to file afresh as and when occasion arises.

4) Counsel for the State has no objection to the above prayer.

5) Permission granted.

6) Accordingly, the applications are dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as stated above.

Sd/- (Gautam Chourdiya) Judge Nadim