← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhCONT/27/2017disposed off

Vijay Kumar Verma v. Baban Singh

2017-02-14Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CONT No.27 of 2017 • Vijay Kumar Verma S/o Shri Ramkripal Verma, Aged About 53 Years Posted As Mechanical Fitter Category V I, Central Hospital, Manendragarh, Hasdeo Area, Civil & Revenue District Korea, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. Baban Singh Chief General Manager, South Eastern Coalfield Limited Hasdeo Area, Post Office- South Jhagarakhand Colliery, Civil & Revenue District Korea, Chhattisgarh

2. S.P.Das, Deputy General Manager (Personnel), South Eastern Coal Fields Ltd., Hasdeo Area, Post South Jhagrakhand Collieries, District Koria, Chhattisgarh

3. Dr. (Smt.) Neelima Ansingkar Chief Medical Officer/ Chief Of Medical Services, Central Hospital, Manendragarh, South Eastern Coalfield Limited Hasdeo Area, Post Office- South Jhagarakhand Colliery, Civil & Revenue District Korea, Chhattisgarh .................(Contemnors) ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri P. M. Shriwas, Advocate For Respondent No.3 :

Shri V. R. Tiwari, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 14/02/2017 Heard.

2.

This petition has been filed alleging willful disobedience of order dated 16-08-2016 passed by this Court in W.P.(S)No.3779 of 2016, by which, direction was issued to consider the petitioner's claim for promotion. 3.

Learned counsel for the respondent No.3 submits that the claim of the petitioner was considered and as the petitioner was not found fit, therefore, he has not been promoted.

4.

Learned counsel for petitioner submits that his case has not received proper consideration and without any decision, he has been superseded by his juniors.

5.

This Court did not decide the petitioner's claim for promotion one way or the other, but only directed consideration. This having been done by the respondent, nothing survives for adjudication in this contempt petition. Rule is discharged.

6.

In the result, the petition is closed. However, it would be open for the petitioner to challenge his supercession on such grounds as may be available to him under the law, by filing separately constituted petition. SD/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) J U D G E Tumane