Subrat Kumar Mitra v. State Of Chhattisgarh

AFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 4721 of 2018 Subrat Kumar Mitra S/o Late S. K. Mitra Aged About 39 Years Woking As Training Officer, Posted At Govt. I.T.I. Ambikapur, District- Sarguja, Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Skill Development, Technical Education And Employment, Department, Mahanadi Bhawan Naya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Director Employment And Training New Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3. Shri Narendra Kumar Sahu Training Superintendent, Posted At Govt. I.T.I. Abhanpur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

4. Shri Khagesh Kumar Gupta Training Superintendent, Posted At Govt. I.T.I. Korba, District- Korba, Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Somkant Verma, Advocate For State : Mr. R.K. Gupta, Dy.A.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta Order On Board 23.07.2018

1. The petitioner has preferred this writ petition to quash order dated 07.06.2018 (Annexure P-1) issued by respondent No.2 for promotion of the private respondents i.e. respondents No. 3 & 4 for the post of Training Superintendent and to direct respondent No.2 to grant him promotion as Training Superintendent, one day before, when the juniors employees have been promoted as Training Superintendent with all consequential benefits and to

decide his pending representation dated 11.06.2018 (Annexure P/5).

2. The petitioner is working as Training Officer and posted at Government I.T.I., Ambikapur, District Surguja.

3. Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the instant writ petition may be disposed of by giving direction to respondent No.2 to decide his pending representation dated 11.06.2018 (Annexure P/5) within a stipulated time.

4. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and submission made by the counsel for the petitioner, the instant writ petition is disposed of with this direction that respondent No.2 shall consider and decide the pending representation of the petitioner dated 11.06.2018 (Annexure P/5) expeditiously preferably within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, according to law and procedure and considering all consequential benefits.

5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.

Sd/- (Sharad Kumar Gupta) JUDGE L/-