High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPT/41/2013disposed off

M/S Hira Ferro Alloys Ltd. v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

2018-03-20Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (T) No. 41 of 2013 M/s Hira Ferro Alloys Ltd., Power Division, 567B, 568, Urla Industrial Area, RaipurC.G., through its authorized signatory Shri N.U. Bhaskar, S/o Shri N.G. Rao, aged about 49 years, r/o Quarter No. C-4, Eka Nagar, Sec-1, Gudhiyari, Raipur, P.O & P.S. Urla, Raipur (C.G.) ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Finance, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.)

2. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary Industries and Commerce Department, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.)

3. Director, Directorate of Industries, LIC Building, II Floor, Pandri, Raipur

4. The Chief Electrical Inspector, B-Block, Second Floor, Indrawati Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)

5. State of Chhattisgarh, through its Secretary, Department of Energy, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Anand Kesharwani, Advocate.

For Respondents : Mr. Dilman Rati Minj, Dy. Govt. Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 20/03/2018 (1) Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners have made an application/representation for grant of separate commencement of commercial production certificate before the Chief General Manager, District Industries & Trade Center on 29 th October, 2012 and also on 04.10.2012 but the same has not been considered and decided till date and, therefore, the competent authority i.e. respondent No. 3 may be directed to decide the same expeditiously.

(2) Prayer appears to be fair and reasonable and accordingly the same is allowed. (3) Be that as it may, the respondent No. 3 is directed to consider and dispose of the petitioners' application/representation expeditiously preferably within a period of two months from the production of certified copy of this order. The petitioners are at liberty to file additional representation, if any.

(4) For the period of two months, interim order dated 2.7.2013 shall remain in force. (5) With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge D/-