Rakesh Kumar Tandon v. State Of Chhattisgarh
AFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 4678 of 2018 Rakesh Kumar Tandon S/o Late Shri Jairam Tandon, Aged About 35 Years, Working As Data Entry Operator And Posted At Janpad Panchayat Baloda Bazar, District Baloda Bazar, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh. R/o Village Sakri, Post Amera, Tahsil Baloda Bazar, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh.
---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat, Mahandi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh
2. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Baloda Bazar, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh
3. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Baloda Bazar, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh.
4. Collector, Baloda Bazar District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondents For the Petitioner :
Shri B.L. Sahu, Advocate appears on behalf of Shri Santosh Kumar Sahu, Advocate For the State :
Shri Dhiraj Wankhede, Govt. Advocate ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta Order On Board /07/2018
1. Heard counsel for the parties.
2. The petitioner has preferred this writ petition to direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization.
3. Petitioner is working as Data Entry Operator and posted at Janpad Panchayat, Baloda Bazar.
4. Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner may file the
fresh representation before the respondents No. 2 & 3 and instant writ petition may be disposed of directing the respondents No. 2 & 3 that he may decide such representation within stipulated time.
5. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of with this direction that the petitioner may file fresh representation before the respondents No. 2 & 3 within ten days from today. The respondents No. 2 & 3 shall decide such representation within sixty days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, according to the law and procedure. This Court has not touched the merits of the case.
Sd/- (Sharad Kumar Gupta) Judge Kamde