← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPL/131/2018disposed off

Chhattisgarh Infrastructure Development Corporation v. Jeevanlal Sahu

2019-03-09Hon'Ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant2 pages

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR NATIONAL LOK ADALAT Judge - Lok Adalat : Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant Member - Lok Adalat : Shri V.V.S. Murthy, Sr. Advocate. WPL No. 131 of 2018 • Chhattisgarh Infrastructure Development Corporation ThroughDivisional Manager, CIDC (Transport Department), Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. Jeevanlal Sahu S/o Ubhaylal Sahu, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Pahadipara, Gulabnagar, Gudhiyari, Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Madhya Pradesh Road Transport Corporation Through It's Managing Director, Habeeb Ganj, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh., District : Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh (State of Chhattisgarh is not arrayed as a party because no relief has been claimed against it) ---- Respondents For Petitioner :- Shri S.D. Sori, Yatayat Parayvekshak- Pratham, C.I.D.C. Mukhyalaya, Raipur, C.G. with Shri Basant Dewangan, counsel for C.I.D.C. Respondent No.1 present in person along with his counsel Shri Vinod Deshmukh.

AWARD (Passed on 9th March, 2019) 1.

A compromise petition (docket) has been filed by the contesting parties. 2.

This WPL has been preferred against the award passed by the Industrial Court in favour of respondent No.1 directing his reinstatement along with 50% backwages.

3.

As per the terms of the compromise, both the parties are agreed to following terms of compromise:- (1) As per order dated 22-01-05 passed by the Labour Court Jeevanlal Sahu will be deemed to have been reinstated w.e.f. 2201-2005, period of termination shall also be treated as continuity of service.

-2- (2) Jeevanlal Sahu shall not claim any back wage as per order dtd. 25-01-2018 passed by Industrial Court.

4.

Shri S.D. Sori representing the petitioner and respondent No.1 present in person have given statement according to the terms as agreed between the parties.

5.

On behalf of the petitioner prayer has been made to withdraw this petition on the basis of aforementioned compromise. 6.

On the basis of the compromise petition (docket) and the statements given by the parties, the petition (WPL) is disposed off as withdrawn. Sd/- Sd/- (R.C.S. Samant) (V.V.S. Murthy) Judge - Lok Adalat Member - Lok Adalat High Court of Chhattisgarh High Court of Chhattisgarh Bilaspur Bilaspur Aadil