Raghuveer Pandey v. Sanchalak, Aurved Yog Avam Prakritik Chikitsa

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 4665 of 2018 1.

Raghuveer Pandey S/o Shri C. L. Pandey Aged About 26 Years Occupation Watermen, R/o Govt. Ayurvedic Chikitsalaya/ College Nutan Chowk Sarkanda, Bilaspur Thana Sarkanda, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

2. Munawwar Ansari S/o Mod. Kuddush Ansari Aged About 34 Years Occupation Rasoiya R/o Govt. Ayurvedic Chikitsalaya College Nutan Chowk Sarkanda, Bilaspur, Thana Sarkanda, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

3. Mahesh Kumar Chauhan S/o Shri Loknath Chauhan Aged About 26 Years Occupation Ward Boy R/o Govt. Ayurvedic Chikitsalaya College Nutan Chowk Sarkanda Bilaspur Thana Sarkanda District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

4. Khulawan Singh Dhruv S/o Shri Ramsantosh Dhruv Aged About 24 Years Occupation Ward Boy R/o Govt. Ayurvedic Chikitsalaya College Nutan Chowk Sarkanda Bilaspur, Thana Sarkanda District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioners

Versus

1. Sanchalak, Aurved Yog Avam Prakritik Chikitsa Yunani Siddh Or Homyopaithi Ayush, Chhattisgarh Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. District Ayurvedic Officer, Office District Ayurved Officer Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

3. Principal Govt. Ayurvedic Chikitsalaya College Nutan Chowk Sarkanda Bilaspur, Thana Sarkanda, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. Abdul Wahab Khan, Advocate For Resp. No.1 : Mr. Ranbir Singh Marhas, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta Order On Board 31.07.2018

1. The petitioners have preferred this writ petition to direct

respondent authorities to grant revised pay scale along with arrears to them.

2. The petitioners are working as Class-IV employees and posted at Government Ayurvedic Hospital, Bilaspur.

3. Counsel for the petitioners would submit that the instant writ petition may be disposed of by giving direction to respondent No.1 to decide their pending representation Annexure P-1 within stipulated time.

4. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and submission made by the counsel for the petitioners, the instant writ petition is disposed of with this direction that respondent No.1 shall consider and decide the pending representation of the petitioners Annexure P-1 expeditiously preferably within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order in accordance with law and procedure.

5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.

Sd/- (Sharad Kumar Gupta) JUDGE L/-