High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/1515/2013dismissed

Brijesh Kumar Yadav v. Union Of India And ORS.

2019-10-01Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Order Sheet WPC No. 1515 of 2013 Brijesh Kumar Yadav S/o Sonsai Yadav, Aged About 30 Years R/o Laxmipur Banjari, Ambikapur, Post Office and Police Station Ambikapur, Dist. Surguja Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi, Delhi

2. Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Through Its General Manager, G-9, All Yawar Jang Marg, Bandra East Mumbai District : Mumbai, Maharashtra

3. The General Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Limited State Office, 16 Arera Hills, Jail Road, Bhopal District : Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh

4. The Chief Area Manager, Indane Area Office, Indian Oil Corporation Lmt. Indian Oil Bhawan, Rajeer Gandhi Marg VIP Road Post Office Ravigram, Telibandha, Raipur District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

5. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, Through Its General Manager LPG Business Sector, Bharat Bhawan, 4 and 6 Currimbhoy Road, Ballard Estate, Mumbai District : Mumbai, Maharashtra

6. The In-Charge Manager Dealer Selection Cell, LPG Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, Goutam Nagar, Office Complex, 1st Floor, Bhopal District : Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh

7. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, through Its General Manager, HPCL, 771, Anandpur, Off Em-Bypass, Kolkata West Bengal, District : Kolkata, West Bengal

8. Senior Regional Manager, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, Raipur LPG Regional Office, Mandir Hasoud, Near P.O.L. Depot, Raipur District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh --- Respondents 01.10.2019 Mr. V.K. Pandey, counsel for the petitioner.

Mr. Chetan Kumar, Adv., on behalf of Mr. B.Gopa Kumar, Asst. S.G., for the UOI/R-1.

Mr. Anand Shukla, counsel for respondents 2, 3 & 4. Mr.Saurabh Sharma, counsel for respondents 5 & 6. Learned counsel for the petitioner pleads no instruction. The matter is of the year 2013.

Since the counsel for the petitioner pleads no instruction, this Court is left with no other way except to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution.

Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge R a o