← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/1124/2017disposed off

Triveni Bai Gengber v. Union Of India

2017-03-07Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy3 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No.1124 of 2017

1. Triveni Bai Gangber W/o Bupendra Kumar Gangber, Aged About 35 Years Working At Primary School Rivagahan, P/s Dongargaon, Tahsil Dongargaon, Block Dongargaon, District Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh)

2. Smt. Bisakha Bai W/o Late Bihari Lal Sahu, Aged About 36 Years Working At Primary School Rivagahan, P/s Dongargaon, Tahsil Dongargaon, Block Dongargaon, District Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh)

3. Smt. Kumari Bai W/o Ghanshyam Sahu, Aged About 35 Years Working At Govt. Middle School Sonesarar, Tahsil Dongargaon, Block Dongargaon, District Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh)

4. Smt. Bisahin Bai W/o Dhanesh Nishad, Aged About 40 Years Working At Govt. Primary School Rudgaon, Tahsil Dongargaon, Block Dongargaon, District Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh)

5. Smt. Sukwaro Bai Thakur W/o Rikhiram Thakur Aged About 42 Years Working At Govt. Middle School Sonesarar, Tahsil Dongargaon, Block Dongargaon, District Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh)

6. Jhamila Bai Mahla W/o Late Toran Lal, Aged About 40 Years Working At Govt. Primary School Kirgi, P/s Dongargaon, Tahsil Dongargaon, Block Dongargaon, District Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh)

7. Smt. Sonbati Sahu, W/o Sukhit Ram, Aged About 39 Years Working At Govt. Middle School Ratapayli, P/s Dongargaon, Tahsil Dongargaon, Block Dongargaon, District Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh)

8. Saroj Patel W/o Shivdayal, Aged About 46 Years Working At Govt. Primary School Rudgaon, P/s Dongargaon, Tahsil Dongargaon, Block Dongargaon, District Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh)

9. Kamin Netam D/o Late Kartik Ram Netam, Aged About 36 Years Working At Govt. Primary School Sonesarar, P/s Dongargaon, Tahsil Dongargaon, Block Dongargaon, District Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh) 10.Smt. Meenabai W/o Kishun Ram Sahu Aged About 50 Years Working At Govt. Primary School Medha, P/s Dongargaon, Tahsil Dongargaon, Block Dongargaon, District Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh). ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. Union Of India Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Human Resources Development, Department Of School Education And Literacy, Mid Day Meal Division Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi

2. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department Of Schools Education Development, Mantralay, Mahanadi Bhawan, Police Station Mandir Hasaud, New Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

3. Director, Lok Sikshan Sanchanalaya, Indrawati Bhawan, New Raipur, Distt. Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

4. Secretary, Labour Officers, Indrawati Bhawan New Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

5. Collector, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon, (Chhattisgarh).

6. District Education Officer, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon, (Chhattisgarh)

7. Labour Office Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh)

8. Block Education Officer, Dongargaon, District Rajnandgaon, (Chhattisgarh). ---- Respondents

For Petitioners :

Shri Anshul R Shrivastava, Advocate.

For respondent No.1 :

Shri Raj Kumar Gupta, Advocate.

For Respondents/State :

Shri Shashank Thakur, Govt. Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 07/03/2017

1. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are working on the post of Cook in the Government Primary School and they are being paid only Rs.1200/- per month i.e. Rs.40/- per day, whereas according to the notification Annexure P/2, minimum wages prescribed by the Chhattisgarh Minimum Wage, they are entitled for Rs.255/- per day as they are skilled labour. He would rely upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in the matter of State of Punjab & Ors.Vs. Jagjit Singh & Ors., decided on 26th October, 2016, in which the Supreme Court has held that the principle of equal pay for equal work will also applicable to all the temporary employees and has been held as under:- "54.

There is no room for any doubt, that the principle of 'equal pay for equal work' has emerged from an interpretation of different provisions of the Constitution. The principle has been expounded through a large number of judgments rendered by this Court, and constitutes law declared by this Court. The same is binding on all the courts in India, under Article 141 of the Constitution of India. The parameters of the principle, have been summarized by us in paragraph 42 hereinabove. The principle of 'equal pay for equal work' has also been extended to temporary employees (differently described as workcharge, daily-wage, casual, ad-hoc, contractual, and the like). The legal position, relating to temporary employees, has been summarized by us, in paragraph 44 hereinabove.

2. In view of above, respondent No.2 is directed to consider the representation of the petitioners in the light of aforesaid judgment of the Supreme Court within 30 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and to pass a

reasoned order in accordance with law on its own merit. The petitioners are at liberty to make an additional representation, if any.

3. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order asto costs.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge inder