Rajesh Kumar Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 622 of 2016 • Purnanand Yadav S/o Shri Gokulram Yadav, Aged About 26 Years R/o School Chowk Hasda No. 1, Tahsil Magarlod, Police Station Magarlod, District Dhamtari (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

2. The Collector, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

3. The Collector, District Dhamtari (Chhattisgarh)

4. The District Education Officer, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari, (Chhattisgarh)

5. Janpad Panchayat Kurud, Through The Chief Executive Officer, District Dhamtari (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondent And WPS No. 724 Of 2016 • Rajesh Kumar Sahu S/o Shri Tulas Ram Sahu, Aged About 39 Years R/o Village Khisora, Hasda No.1, Tahsil Magarlod, Police Station Magarlod, District Dhamtari, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner Vs

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

2. The Collector, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

3. The Collector , District Dhamtari, (Chhattisgarh)

4. The District Education Officer, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari, (Chhattisgarh)

5. Janpad Panchayat Magarlod, Through The Chief Executive Officer, District Dhamtari, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondent For Petitioners : Shri Prateek Sharma, Advocate.

For Respondent/State : Shri Shashank Thakur, Govt. Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 30/03/2017

1. Learned counsel for the petitioners and learned State Counsel as well would submit that the issue raised in these writ petitions is covered by the judgment rendered by the coordinate Bench in the matter of Smt. Geeta Sukhdeve Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Others (WPS No.1273/2016) and other connected matters on 23.12.2016.

2. In view of the statement made, both the Writ Petitions are allowed in the same terms.

Sd/- Judge (Prashant Kumar Mishra) Barve