High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/1250/2017disposed off

Smt. Sangeeta Kaiwartya v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-03-15Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 1250 of 2017

1. Smt. Sangeeta Kaiwartya Shri Jageshwar Prasad Kenwat Aged About 25 Years Occupation 4th Class/ Rashoiya Karmi Govt. Pri Matric Anusuchit Jati Girls Hostel Village Janjgir, R/o Village Janjgir, Thana- Janjgir, Dist. Janjgir-Champa (Chhattisgarh)

2. Smt. Hema Yadav Shri Jagdish Yadav Aged About 24 Years Occupation 4th Class/ Rashoiya Karmi Govt. Pri Matric Anusuchit Jati Girls Hostel Janjgir Village Janjgir, R/o Village Janjgir, ThanaJanjgir, Dist. Janjgir-Champa (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Secretary, Aadim Jati Tatha Anusuchit Jati Vikash Vibhag, Mantrayalaya, New Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

2. Commissioner, Aadim Jati And Anusuchit Jati Vikash Raipur, Dist. Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

3. Assistant Commissioner, Aadivashi Vikash, Janjgir-Champa, Dist. Janjgir-Champa (Chhattisgarh)

4. The Collector, Collector Office Aadivashi Vikash, Janjgir Champa, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (Chhattisgarh) ----Respondents For Petitioners:

Mr. R.K. Patel, Advocate For State :

Mr. S.P. Kale, Dy. Advocate General Hon'ble Sh ri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order on Board 15.03 .2

1. Heard.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners have made applications for appointment on the post of Contingency Paid Employee before respondent No.3 i.e. Assistant Commissioner, Aadiwashi Vikash, Janjgir-Champa, which have not been considered and decided till this date and therefore, appropriate direction may be issued to respondent

No.3 to decide the same expeditiously.

3. Prayer appears to be fair and reasonable.

4. Be that as it may, respondent No.3 is directed to consider and take a decision on the pending applications of the petitioners in accordance with law expeditiously from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. The petitioners are at liberty to file additional representation, if any before respondent No.3 for redressal of their grievance.

5. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) JUDGE kishore