← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/1287/2017disposed off

Sanjay Kumar Sharma v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-03-16Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 1287 of 2017 • Sanjay Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Ramashankar Sharma Aged About 35 Years R/o Village & Post- Kalinjar Civil Revenue, District- Banda (Up) Pin-210129 ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Law & Legislative Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Civil & Revenue District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The District & Secession Judge, Kabirdham Civil & Rev. District Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Dinesh Tiwari, Advocate.

For State / Respondents :

Shri Adhiraj Surana, Dy. Govt. Advocate SB: Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 16/03/2017 1.

The grievance of the Petitioner is that the Petitioner's wife was working as Assistant Grade - II - cum - Steno Clerk in the establishment of Respondent No.2 who died in harness in the year 2006. After her death, the Petitioner has moved an application before Respondent No.2 seeking compassionate appointment.

2.

The said application has till date not been decided much less any intimation been given to the Petitioner as to what steps have been taken on the said application.

3.

Learned counsel for the Petitioner makes a limited prayer for issuance of a direction to Respondent No.2 to at least inform the Petitioner as to

what decision has been taken on the application for compassionate appointment, whether the Petitioner is entitled for compassionate appointment or not, if he is not entitled, on what grounds. 4.

Learned State counsel has no objection to the relief sought for by the Petitioner.

5.

In view of the above submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, this petition is disposed of with a direction to Respondent No.2 to intimate the Petitioner in respect of steps being taken by it on the application for grant of compassionate appointment made by him. In case, if the decision has already been taken, the Petitioner may be intimated in respect of the order so passed by Respondent No.2. 6.

Let this exercise be carried out within a period of 90 days from the date of production of certified copy of this order. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) JUDGE chandra