High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/5222/2016disposed off

Gajendra Kumar Chouhan v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2016-09-27Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava2 pages

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 5222 of 2016

1. Gajendra Kumar Chouhan S/o Late Shri Natthu Lal Chouhan, Aged About 45 Years Lecturer, Govt. Higher Secondary School Malda (B) Block & Tahsil Sarangarh Dist. Raigarh (Chhattisgarh)

2. Smt. Sangeeta Minj, W/o. Shri Juvela Minz, Aged About 44 Years Lecturer, Govt. Higher Secondary School Chhind, Tahsil Sarangarh Dist. Raigarh (Chhattisgarh)

3. Ramesh Lal Bharti S/o Shri Ghunaru Ram, Aged About 45 Years Lecturer, Govt. Higher Secondary School Hardi, Tahsil Sarangarh Dist. Raigarh (Chhattisgarh)

4. Smt. Rajkumari Mahendra W/o Shri S. R. Mahendra, Aged About 38 Years Lecturer, (Govt. Girls H. S. School) Govt. Mumtpurpose Higher Secondary School Sarangarh Block & Tahsil Sarangarh Dist. Raigarh (Chhattisgarh)

5. Smt. Kamini Dansena, W/o. Shri Chunamani Dansena, Aged About 44 Years Lecturer, Govt. Higher Secondary School Dansara, Block & Tahsil Sarangarh Dist. Raigarh (Chhattisgarh)

6. Suresh Singh Chouhan S/o Shri Sureet Ram Chouhan, Lecturer, Govt. Higher Secondary School Farswani, Block & Tahsil Sarangarh Dist. Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

2. The Collector, Raigarh, District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh).

3. District Education Officer, Raigarh, District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh).

4. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Raigarh, District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh)

5. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Sarangarh District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents

-2For Petitioners : Shri R.S. Patel, Advocate For Respondent-State : Shri S.P. Kale, Dy. A.G. S.B.:

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board /09/2016 Heard on admission.

At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner would be satisfied that the direction is issued for consideration of representation for claim of grant of scale promotion as well as grant of revised pay scale from the initial date upon completion of 8 years of service. In view of the submission and without commenting upon the merits of the case, the representation of the petitioner be decided by respondent No.4 as early as possible.

The petition is accordingly disposed off.

Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Rekha