Ramlakhan Patel And ORS. v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No.2155 of 2013

1. Ramlakhan Patel S/o Tirath Patel Aged About 37 Years R/o Nagar Panchayat, Residential Colony, Aawrabhata, Dantewada, District Dantewada, Chhattisgarh

2. Mahesh Sharma, S/o Banshilal Sharma, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Purana I.T.I., Geedam, Police Station & Post Geedam, District Dantewada, Chhattisgarh

3. Balsingh Thakur, S/o Late Suttasingh, aged about 40 Years, R/o Haurnag, Post Gumda, Polie Station Geedam, Distt Dantewada, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Deptt Of Urban Administration and Development, DKS Bhawan, Raipur, Police Station Civil Lines, Raipur, Head Post Office, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Commissioner, Urban Administration and Development, Directorate, Raipur, Police Station Civil Lines, Raipur, Head Post Office, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Nagar Panchayat, Geedam, through its Chief Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Geedam, Police Station and Post Geedam, Distt South Bastar, Dantewada, Chhattisgarh

4. Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Geedam, Police Station and Post Geedam, Distt South Bastar, Dantewada, Chhattisgarh

5. Collector, South Bastar, Dantewada, Police Station and Post Dantewada, Distt. South Bastar, Dantewada, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents

For Petitioners Mr. Manoj Paranjpe, Advocate For Respondent-State Mr. Sunil Owani, Addl. AG Hon'ble Justice Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 26/08/2021 1.

At the outset, Mr. Manoj Paranjpe, learned counsel for the petitioners, would submit that the writ petition has become infructuous, as no cause of action survives for consideration. 2.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed having become infructuous.

Sd/- Sanjay K. Agrawal Judge Nirala