← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/4984/2019disposed off

Smt. Buddhimati Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-07-09Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4984 of 2019

1. Smt. Buddhimati Sahu W/o Khilawan Singh Aged About 33 Years Occupation Assistant Teacher (L. B.) Govt. Primary School Doma R/o Village Doma, Police Station Arjuni, Block Dhamtari, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh

2. Premlal Sahu W/o Mangluram Sahu Aged About 35 Years Occupation Assistant Teacher (L. B.) Govt. Primary School Doma R/o Village Doma, Police Station Arjuni, Block Dhamtari, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh

3. Rani Sahu W/o Vikas Sahu Aged About 31 Years Occupation Assistant Teacher (L. B.) Govt. Primary School Doma R/o Village Doma, Police Station Arjuni, Block Dhamtari, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh

4. Smt. Dimeshwari Sahu S/o M. M. Sahu Aged About 33 Years Occupation Assistant Teacher (L. B.) Govt. Primary School Bhalukona, R/o Village Bhalukona, Police Station Kurud, Block Dhamtari, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh

5. Chhaganlal Vishwakarma D/o Bhukhelal Aged About 36 Years Occupation Assistant Teacher (L. B.) Govt. Primary School Madhubanpara Rakadih, R/o Village Rakadih, Police Station Magarlod, Block Dhamtari, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanandi Bhawan, Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Secretary Panchayat And Rural Development Department, And Nagriya Nikaya Vibhag, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. District Education Officer, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh

4. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Magarlod, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh

---- Respondents For Petitioners :

Mr. Rajendra Kumar Patel, Advocate.

For State :

Ms. Sunita Jain, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 09/07/2019

1. The limited grievance of the petitioners is that petitioners are entitled for the benefit of Kramonnati on completing 10 years of service which they have completed but they have not been given the same till date.

2. Given the limited grievance raised, let the petitioners make detailed representation in this regard to respondents 3 & 4 who in turn shall scrutinize the same and pass a suitable order in accordance with the rules governing the field of Kramonnati. It is expected that an appropriate order shall be passed within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of representation of the petitioners.

3. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Khatai