Smt.Jamun Bai Dhruv v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.
© BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.1 W.P. fd N0. \^v Of 2014 iwlwwss BgnR!l Smt.
Jamun Bai Dhruv wife of PETITIONER Ghurau Ram Dhruv, aged about 38 years, Sarpanch (removed), Gram Panchayat Basin, Janpad Panchayat P.S.
Suhela, Civil and x Revenue BalodabazarBhatapara (C.G.)» <.v^°" / ^y~ .
^"
'^^
VERSUS
RESPONDENTS 1.
State of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, RaipurC.G.) 2.
Collector, Balodabazar-Bhatapara (C.G.), 3.
Sub Divisional Officer & Prescribed Authority (Panchayat), Bhatapara, Balodabazar-Bhatapara (C.G.) 4.
Sub Divisional Officer & Prescribed Authority (Panchayat), Balodabazar-Bhatapara (C.G.) 5.
Tahsildar Presiding Officer, Balodabazar Bhatapara (C.G.), '<\.
?
Chief Executive Officer, Janpad 6.
Balodabazar-Bhatapara (C.G.), Shri S.L.
Dhritlahare, Tahsildar 7.
Presiding Officer, at present posted at Balodabazar, Balodabazar-Bhatapara (C.G.), Gram Basin, Through 8.
The Secretary, Gram Basin, Tahsil & Block Simga, District Balodabazar-Bhatapara (C.G.), Smt.
Panna Bai Banjare, wife of 9.
Samaru Banjare, Up Sarpanch, Smt.
Koushilya .Sahu, wife of 10, Baratu, Kanshi Ram Jangade, son of Mangal 11.
Das, Smt. Pushpa Banjare, wife of Amit 12.
Das, Rameshwar Verma, son of Amarnath 13.
Verma, Smt.
Rukhmani Yadav, wife of 14.
Ashok Yadav, Daulal Verma, son of Gopal, 15.
Kejuram Dhruv, son of Hari Ram 16.
Dhruv, Shailendri Dhruv, wife of Ageshwar 17.
Dhruv, <», No.W to 17 are the Panchas, Gram
Basin, Tahsil Block BalodabazarBhatapara (C.G.), WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA •<<
•'
'^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR W.P.(ClNo.1170 of 2014 PETITIONER Smt. Jamun Bai Dhruv
Versus
RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & others Shri Raghvendra Pradhan, counsel forthe petitioner. Shri S. Pillai, P.L. forthe State.
SINGLE BENCH HON'BLE SHRI PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, J.
ORALORDER (04/03/2015) Petitioner was Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat, Basin. A No Confidence Motion was moved against the petitioner and she was ousted from the office. Since thereafter new election for the said Panchayat has already taken place, therefore, the writ petition has been rendered infructuous. <t 2.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. .- - ^uDaat ^<