← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/2012/2018disposed off

Gorelal v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-07-23Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 2012 of 2018 Gorelal S/o Bahartu Kashyap, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Village Kutra, P.S. Pamgarh, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Revenue Department, Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Collector, Janjgir District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh., District : JanjgirChampa, Chhattisgarh

3. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Janjgir District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

4. Tahsildar, Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh., District : JanjgirChampa, Chhattisgarh --- Respondents For Petitioners :

Mr. Nasimuddin Ansari, Advocate.

For Respondents/State :

Mr. Ashish Surana, Panel Lawyer.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 23/07/18 1.

This writ petition has been preferred against the order dated 14.07.2018 (Annexure - P/1) passed by the Tahsildar, District Janjgir Champa under Section 248(1) of the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code, 1959 (for brevity, 'Code of 1959') 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the impugned order is unsustainable and bad in law and deserves to be set aside. 3.

Learned State counsel submits that the order passed by the Tahsildar is appealable before the Appellate Authority under Section 44(1) of the Code of 1959.

4.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

5.

Since, the order is appealable before the Appellate Authority under Section 44(1) of the Code of 1959, this Court is not inclined to entertain this writ petition. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to prefer an appeal against the said order in accordance with law. The petitioner may also make an application for grant of interim relief before the said authority. 6.

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka