High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/5058/2019disposed off

Ramshankar Jaiswal v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-07-10Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5058 of 2019

1. Ramshankar Jaiswal, S/o Shri Vishnu Prasad Jaiswal Aged About 68 Years Retired Patwari R/o Village Kachhar, Tahsil Patthalgaon, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Revenue And Disaster Management Department Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. The Accountant General Government Of Chhattisgarh Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. The Director Treasury, Account And Pension, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh

4. The Collector (Land Record) Raigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh

5. The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Sarangarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh

6. The Tahsildar Raigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh

7. The Tahsildar Sarangarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. K.P. Sahu, Advocate For Respondents :

Mr. Rajkumar Gupta, Advocate For State :

Mr. P. Acharya, Panel Lawyer Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 10.07.2019

1. The limited grievance that the petitioner has raised in the present Writ Petition is that though the respondents vide order dated 20.12.2010 (Annexure P-1) had sanctioned Second Kromonnati to the petitioner w.e.f. 03.11.2003 but the same till date has not been

implemented, as before the same could be implemented; the petitioner stood retired from service w.e.f 30.09.2011.

2. Taking into consideration, the said limited issue involved in the writ petition ends of justice would meet, if the writ petition is disposed off with a direction to the Respondent No. 02 to 04 to verify, whether the petitioner has been extended the benefit of the Second Kramonnati as ordered vide Order dated 20.12.2010. If the same has not been extended, the same should be released forthwith to the petitioner and the pension and pensionary benefit should be revised and released accordingly and if it has been already been implemented and released, the petitioner should be intimated in this regard.

3. Let this exercise be concluded within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of copy of this Order. It shall be the responsibility of the petitioner to apprise the Respondent No. 02 to 04 in this regard.

4. Accordingly, the present Writ Petition stands disposed off. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Rahul