High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/2174/2017disposed off

Indra Bahadur Singh v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-07-19Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava2 pages

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 2174 of 2017

1. Indra Bahadur Singh S/o Late Bundal Ram, Aged About 49 Years Shiksha Karmi Grade- Ill, Posted At Primary School, Domanhil, Block Khadgawan District Korea (Chhattisgarh)

2. Lalit Singh, S/o Shri Bilasram, Aged About 44 Years Shiksha Karmi Grade- Ill, Posted At Primary School, Domanhil, Block Khadgawan District Korea (Chhattisgarh)

3. Om Prakash Singh Khairwar, S/o Late Bhondal Singh, Aged About 49 Years Shiksha Karmi Grade- Ill, Posted At Govt. Girls Primary School, Chirimiri Colliery, Block Khadgawan District Korea (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through : The Secretary, Urban Administration Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

2. Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Chirimiri, District Korea (Chhattisgarh)

3. Block Education Officer, Block Khadgawan, District Korea (Chhattisgarh)

4. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Koriea, District Koriea (Chhattisgarh)

5. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Khadganwa, District : Korea (Chhattisgarh)

6. Secretary, Panchayat & Rural Development Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents For Petitioners :

Shri Avinash Chand Sahu and Shri Vijay Kumar Sahu, Advocates For State :

Shri Satish Gupta, Govt. Advocate For Respondent No.2 :

Shri Sudeep Agrawal, Advocate S.B. Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 19/07/2017 Heard.

1. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred seeking direction to the respondents for grant of benefit of time bound promotion/Kramonnati on completion of continuous ten years of service on the same post.

-22. Counsel for the petitioners submits that similar writ petition has already been decided in favour of similarly placed person and one such petition is Writ Petition No.4623 of 2016, decided by this Court on 08.09.2016. He further submits that present petition being similar in nature may also be disposed off in similar terms.

3. Learned counsel for the State also does not dispute the above factual position.

4. Accordingly, the present petition is also disposed off in similar terms. The period in respect of which the petitioners are entitled shall be from 02.11.2011 to 30.04.2013.

Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Praveen