Jai Mata Mahila Swa Sahayata Samuh v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 535 of 2016 • Jai Mata Mahila Swa Sahayata Samuh Kandekela, Samiti, Through Its President Smt. Namrata Sinha, W/o Shri Domar Singh Sinha, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Village Kandekela, Block Mainpur, Tehsil Mainpur, District Gariyaband, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. The State Of Chhattisgarh Through: The Secretary, Women And Child Development Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

2. The Collector, Gariyaband, District Gariyaband, (Chhattisgarh)

3. Project Officer, Integrated Child Development Project Mainpur, District Gariyaband, (Chhattisgarh)

4. District Program Officer, Women And Child Development Department Gariyaband, District Gariyaband, (Chhattisgarh)

5. Jai Maa Sharda Swa Sahayata Samuh, Through Its President Jai Maa Sharda Swa Sahayata Samuh Bhaijakot, Mainpur, District Gariyaband, (Chhattisgarh)

6. Jai Maa Devi Mahila Swa Sahayata Samuh, Through Its President Jai Maa Devi Mahila Swa Sahayata Samuh, Kandekela, District Gariyaband, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondent For Petitioner : Shri P.P. Sahu, Advocate.

For Respondent/State : Shri S. Majid Ali, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 02/11/2016

1. It is argued by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that vide agreements dated 17.12.2015 the petitioner was made entitled to supply ready to eat food material in Sectors Urmal and Idagaon for a period of 5 years and the said agreements are still subsisting, yet the impugned order has been passed by respondent No.3 cancelling its agreements. Learned counsel would submit that the impugned order has been passed without affording any opportunity of hearing.

2. Considering the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction that the petitioner shall make a representation before the concerned Collector bringing into his notice the above aspect of the matter and any other ground which may be available to it within a period of one month from today. The concerned Collector shall thereafter constitute a committee as required under clause 11 of the agreement and take decision in the matter within a further period of three months, after providing opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

3. It is made clear that till the matter is decided by the Collector, the petitioner shall continue to supply ready to eat food material to Idagaon and Urmal Sectors.

Sd/- Judge (Prashant Kumar Mishra) Barve