Vinod Prasad Sinha v. State Of Chhattisgarh

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5059 of 2019 Vinod Prasad Sinha S/o Late Narsingh Sinha Aged About 56 Years Presently Posted And Working As Accountant, Office Of Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Development Balrampur, District- Balrampur, Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh., District : Balrampur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Scheduled Tribe And Scheduled Caste Development Department, Mahanadi Mantralaya, Naya Raipur Post Office And Police Station Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Commissioner Sarguja Division, Ambikapur, District- Sarguja, Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh

3. Collector Balrampur Ramanujganj, District- Balrampur Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh., District : Balrampur, Chhattisgarh

4. Assistant Commissioner Tribal Development, Balrampur, District- Balrampur, Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh., District : Balrampur, Chhattisgarh

5. The Project Administrator Integrated Tribal Development Project Ramanujganj, District- Balrampur, Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh., District : Balrampur, Chhattisgarh ---Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Aditya Bhardwaj, Advocate For State :

Mr. Chandresh Shrivastava, Dy. A.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 20/08/2019 1.

The challenge in the present Writ Petition is to the order Annexure P/1 dated 24.05.2019 whereby the services of the petitioner has been attached/adjusted (Samayojit) from the post of Accountant, Office of Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Development, Balrampur to the post of Accountant, Office of Project Administrator Integrated Tribal Development Project Ramanujganj.

-22.

Without entering into the merits of the case, the counsel for the petitioner wants that the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation to the respondents raising the objections and grievances on his being transferred and the respondents in turn may decide the same as expeditiously as possible.

3.

Not opposed.

4.

Accordingly, the instant Writ Petition stands disposed off with liberty to the petitioner if he so chooses may prefer a detailed representation to the respondents, which in turn considering the fact that it is a case of transfer, the respondents may decide it as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved