Laxmi Singh v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 2077 of 2018

1. Laxmi Singh S/o Late Shri Sarjuram Aged About 40 Years OccupationKrishi Niwashi- Gram- Choura, Thana- Rajpur, Tahsil- Rajpur, DistrictBalrampur, Chhattisgah., District : Balrampur, Chhattisgarh

2. Balramnath S/o Late Shri Bankuram Aged About 42 Years OccupationKrishi Niwashi- Gram- Jagannathpur, Thana- Pratappur, District- Surajpur, Chhattisgah., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh

3. Santosh Ming S/o Late Shri Makkhanlal Aged About 42 Years OccupationKrishi Niwashi- Gram- Jagannathpur, Thana- Pratappur, District- Surajpur, Chhattisgah.

4. Banslal S/o Late Shri Baudharam Aged About 25 Years Occupation- Krishi Niwashi- Gram- Jagannathpur, Thana- Pratappur, Tahsil- Pratappur, DistrictSurajpur, Chhattisgah. ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through-Secretary, Panchayat Gramin Vikas And Anusuchit Jati Janjati Kalyan Vibhag Mantralaya, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Collector Balrampur District- Balrampur, Chhattisgarh., District : Balrampur, Chhattisgarh

3. Collector Surajpur, District- Surajpur, Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh

4. Sarpanch Gram Panchayat Chowra, District- Balrampur, Chhattisgarh., District : Balrampur, Chhattisgarh

5. Sarpanch Gram Panchayat Jagannathpur, District- Surajpur, Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh

6. Mukhya Niyantrak Coll India Mukhyalaya Kokkata India, New Dehli., District : New Delhi, Delhi

7. Mahaprabandhak S.E.C.L. Mukhyalaya Sarkanda, Bilaspur, DistrictBilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

8. Mukhya Prabandhak S.E.C.L. Bhatgaon, Chhetra District- Surajpur, Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioners :

Mr. Abdul Wahab Khan, Advocate.

For Respondents / State :

Mr. R. N. Pusty, G. A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 31/07/18 1.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that against the acquisition of their lands, petitioners have made a representation before the Collector on 13.02.2016 but till date no decision has been taken on the said representation.

2.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners. 3.

Be that as it may, the Collector, Surajpur / Balrampur is directed to consider and take decision on the petitioners' representation strictly in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 4.

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

SD/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka