Ravindra Kuamr Jari v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 2086 of 2018

1. Ravindra Kuamr Jari S/o Late Shri Mohanlal Jari, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Geedam, Near Bus Stand, Tahsil Geedam, District Dantewada Chhattisgarh.

2. Hitenda Kumar Jari, S/o Late Shri Mohanlal Jari, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Geedam, Near Bus Stand, Tahsil Geedam, District Dantewada Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Revenue And Disaster Management, Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. The Commissioner, Bastar Division, Jagdalpur, District Bastar Chhattisgarh.

3. The Collector, Dantewada, District Dantewada Chhattisgarh.

4. The Tahsildar, Geedam, District Dantewada Chhattisgarh.

5. Jawahar Lal Surana S/o Late Ratanlal Surana, R/o Geedam, District Dantewada Chhattisgarh., District : Dantewada, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioners :

Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Pandey, Advocate.

For Respondents / State :

Mr. Anand Dadariya, Dy. G. A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 01/08/18 1.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that petitioners have made representation to the Collector, District Dantewada for redressal of their grievances on 11.03.2016 but it has not been considered and decided till date.

2.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners. 3.

Be that as it may, the Collector, District Dantewada is directed to consider petitioners' representation and take decision on the same,

expeditiously, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order after hearing the affected parties. 4.

It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter. It is for the authority to consider and decide the petitioners' representation strictly in accordance with law. 5.

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

SD/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka