Vijay Kumar Bhaskar v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 4087 of 2020
1. Vijay Kumar Bhaskar S/o Ramchandra Bhaskar Aged About 36 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Primary School, Raipali, Block Pussore, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh
2. Anoop Kumar Sidar S/o Makhursay Sidar Aged About 38 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Primary School, Paipali, Block Pussore, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh.
3. Dayaram Sidar S/o Harishankar Sidar Aged About 33 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Primary School, Navapara (B), Block Pussore, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh,
4. Bisikeshan Sidar S/o Makhan Sidar Aged About 52 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Primary School, Jiladi, Block Pussore, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh,
5. Sanjeev Kumar Chouhan S/o Pushram Chouhan Aged About 38 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Primary School, Khaprapali, Block Pussore, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh.
6. Smt. Rajkumari Bhaskar W/o Vijay Kumar Bhaskar Aged About 35 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Primary School, Taparda, Block Pussore, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh.
---- Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education , Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
2. Secretary Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya , Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
3. Commissioner Cum Director Directorate Of Panchayat , Indrawati Bhawan , Atal Nagar Naya Raipur , District Raipur Chhattisgarh..
4. Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indrawati Bhawan , Atal Nagar Naya Raipur , District Raipur Chhattisgarh.,
5. District Education Officer Raigarh , District Raigarh Chhattisgarh.,
6. Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Pussore , District Raigarh Chhattisgarh.,
7. Block Education Officer Pussore, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondents For Petitioners :
Mr. Govind Dewangan, Advocate.
For State :
Ms. Akanksha Jain, Dy. G.A.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order 14-10-2020
1. Heard.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are entitled for Kramonnati as per circulars dated 19.04.1999, 28.04.2008,03.10.2008 and 11.01.2010 after completion of 10 years of service. He submits that the issue involved in the present petition has already been considered and decided by this Court in the matter of R.S. Verma Vs.
State of Chhattisgarh and Others (W.PS) No.2805/2002 by judgment and order dated 29.08.2006. He further submits that the petitioners may be granted liberty to make a representation to consider the case of the petitioner in the light of the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the
matter of State of Tripura and Others Vs. K.K. Roy (2004 SCW/1) and the order passed in R.S. Verma (supra) top which learned counsel for the respondent/State has no objection.
3. Accordingly, the liberty sought for by the petitioners is granted to make a representation before the concerned authority. It is expected from the competent authority subject to verification decide the representation of the petitioners as expeditiously as possible in an objective manner preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
4. In view of above, the petition is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty.
Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge Raju