← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/2058/2018disposed off

Pragatisheel Machhua Sahkari Samiti Maryadit v. The State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-07-26Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 2058 of 2018 Pragatisheel Machhua Sahkari Samiti Maryadit Girra (Registration No. 311, Dated 25-01-2012), Gram Panchayat Girra, Vikas Khand And Tahsil Palari, Through The Secretary, Thakur Ram, Aged About 40 Years, Son Of Shri Dasaru Ram Dheemar, R/o Village Girra, Tahsil Palari, District Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. The State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Agriculture (Fisheries), New Mantralaya, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Collector, Baloda Bazar, District Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh.

3. The Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Girra, Tahsil Palari, District Baloda BazarBhatapara, Chhattisgarh.

4. The Additional Commissioner, Raipur, Division, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

5. The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) , Baloda Bazar, District Baloda BazarBhatapara, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Patel, Advocate.

For Respondents / State :

Mr. Ashish Surana, Panel Lawyer.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 26/07/18 1.

This writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner being aggrieved against the order dated 22.03.2018 (Annexure - P/1) passed by Additional Commissioner, Raipur.

2.

Learned State counsel would submit that against the order of Additional Commissioner, revision would be maintainable before the Revisional Authority under the Chhattisgarh Panchayats (Appeal and Revision) Rules, 1995 (for brevity, 'Rules of 1995'). 3.

At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be

allowed to prefer revision before the Revisional Authority under the Rules of 1995.

4.

The prayer is fair and reasonable and is accordingly allowed. 5.

Be that as it may, if the petitioner prefers revision before the Revisional Authority within two weeks from today, it will be considered and decided by the said authority, expeditiously, in accordance with law. 6.

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

Certified copy today.

SD/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka