High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/2495/2017disposed off

Ashok Kumar Goutam v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-06-22Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 2495 of 2017 • Ashok Kumar Goutam S/o Shri Kalidas Goutam, Aged About 59 Years Posted As Lecturer At Government High School, Achanakpur (Selud), Block Patan, District Durg (Chhattisgarh), R/o 38, Bimleshwari Colony, Ward No. 52, Borsi, Behind Narnarayan Temple, Durg, District Durg (Chhattisgarh). ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh).

2. The Collector, District Durg (Chhattisgarh).

3. The Director, Public Instructions Education Raipur District Raipur (Chhattisgarh).

4. The District Education Officer, District Durg (Chhattisgarh).

5. The Block Education Officer, District Durg (Chhattisgarh). ---- Respondents For Petitioners Mr. J.N. Nande, Advocate For State Mr. Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer SB: Hon'ble Shri Justice P.Sam Koshy Order On Board 22.06.2017

1. The present Petition has been preferred seeking for a direction to Respondent No.1 to provide two advance increments as per the circular dated 24.12.1998 on account of having acquired the qualification of B.Ed. after appointment.

2. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that lot of Writ Petitions of similar nature have already been decided by this Court. One such matter is WP(S) No. 4782 of 2015 decided on 04.02.2016.

3. Learned State Counsel after due verification of the facts accepts the fact that

the case of the present Petitioner is also similar to those Petitions which have already been disposed off by this Court and the present Petition may be disposed off in similar terms.

4. Accordingly, the present Writ Petition is also disposed off in similar terms as ordered in WP(S) No. 4782 of 2015 decided on 04.02.2016.

5. It is made clear that in case the Petitioner after verification of the facts is found similarly situated, then the similar benefits shall also be provided to the present Petitioner as have been provided to the other Petitioners whose case have already been decided.

6. Accordingly, the present Writ Petition stands disposed off. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) JUDGE kishore