← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/4807/2018disposed off

Santosh Kumar Madhukar v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-08-21Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4807 of 2018 Santosh Kumar Madhukar S/o Shri Prem Lal Madhukar, aged about 41 years, R/o village Pachpedi, Police Station Pachpedi, Tahsil Masturi, - Civil & Revenue District Bilaspur (C.G.).

- ---Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Department of Home, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur (C.G.).

2. The Director General of Police, Raipur, Civil & Revenue District Raipur (C.G.).

3. The Inspector General of Police, Range Sarguja, Civil & Revenue District Sarguja (C.G.).

-

4. The Superintendent of Police, Balrampur, Civil & Revenue District Balrampur (C.G.).

5. The Superintendent of Police, Jashpur, Civil & Revenue District Jashpur (C.G.).

---Respondents For petitioner :

Shri Vishwanath Shriwas on behalf of Shri Parasmani Shriwas, Advocate.

For State :

Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 21/08/2018 1.

The prayer made by the petitioner in the instant Writ Petition is for issuance of direction to the respondents for grant of compassionate appointment.

2.

The State counsel was directed to seek instructions on 26/07/2018. 3.

Thereafter, the matter has been listed again on 03/08/2018 on which date also the State took time.

4.

Today also, the matter is listed and the State counsel submits that, the reply could not be prepared.

5.

Perusal of record would show that, there is an order in favour of the petitioner issued by the respondent No.3 considering his claim for compassionate appointment.

6.

The counsel for the petitioner only wants a direction that the respondent No.3 or whoever the concerned authorities is may act upon the letter dated 21/12/2015 and issue appropriate orders in this regard. 7.

The above-said limited prayer is not opposed by the State counsel. 8.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed off with a direction to the respondent No.3 to ensure that appropriate orders in respect of the claim of the petitioner for grant of compassionate appointment is issued at the earliest preferably within a period of 60 days from today. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Sumit JUDGE