Gajanan Rathod v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 5118 of 2020

1. Gajanan Rathod S/o Shri Sadashiv Rao Rathod Aged About 44 Years Presently Working As Computer Programmer At CGPSC Officer , R/o F/2/2, GAD Colony , Kachana, Raipur , Police Station Vidhan Sabha, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Deepak Kumar Thakur S/o Shri B.S. Thakur Aged About 37 Years Presently Working As Computer Programmer At CGPSC Officer, R/o D 5, Gulshan Vatika Sejbahar, Raipur , Police Station Mujgahan, Raipur , District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary , Department Of General Administration, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur , Post Office And Police Station Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Finance , Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur , Post Office And Police Station Naya Raipur , District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. Director Directorate Of Treasury Accounts And Pensions Chhattisgarh, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Raipur Post Office And Police Station Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.,

4. Secretary Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission, Raipur , Shankar Nagar Road, Raipur Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Vivek Kumar Agrawal, Advocate For State :

Shri Rahul Jha G.A.

For Respondent No. 4 :

Shri Sukhnath Painkra, Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 18.01.2021

1. The petitioners are employees of the CGPSC. The grievance of the petitioners are that they were appointed on a regular basis w.e.f.

09.09.2008 on probation for a period of two years and on which post they were confirmed immediately on completion of two years in the year 2010.

2. According to the petitioners, the first time bound promotion on completion of eight years was payable to the petitioners w.e.f. September 2016 but the same has been granted to the petitioners after about a year delay on 04.06.2017.

3. The grievance now of the petitioners is that since the benefit of the time bound pay-scale has not been given to them from the date they completed eight years of service, the petitioners have been put to loss on account of the implementation of 7th pay commission and for which they have already made a detailed representation to the respondent No. 4 but the representation till date has not been decided.

4. Given the limited grievance of the petitioners, the writ petition at this juncture stands disposed of directing the respondent No. 4 to take a decision on the representation of the petitioner at the earliest in accordance with Rules and Circulars of the State Government governing the field within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. In-addition, the petitioner would also be entitled to make a fresh representation to the respondent No. 4.

5. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. Sd/- P. Sam Koshy Judge Jyotijha