M/S Niranjanlal Agrawal v. South Eastern Coalfield Limited
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No.2075 of 2018 M/s Niranjanlal Agrawal A Proprietorship Firm, Through Its Proprietor Namely Shri Raj Agrawal, S/o Niranjan Agrawal, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Tulsi Marg, Korba, Police Station And Post Korba, District- Korba, Chhattisgarh ----Petitioner
Versus
1. South Eastern Coalfield Limited A Subsidiary Of Coal India Ltd., Through Its Chief General Manager, Bishrampur Area, Post Bishrampur, Aamagaon Colliery, District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh
2. General Manager S.E.C.L. Dipka Area Dipka Project, Korba, DistrictKorba, Chhattisgarh
3. Deputy General Manager South Eastern Coalfields Limited, Dipka Area, Korba, District- Korba, Chhattisgarh
4. Staff Officer (Mining) South Eastern Coalfields Limited, Dipka Area, Korba, District- Korba, Chhattisgarh
5. Project Finance Manager Dipka Expansion Project, Korba, DistrictKorba, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner :
Mr.Manoj Paranjape, Advocate For Respondents :
Mr.Vinod Deshmukh, Advocate ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 31/07/2018
1. Learned counsel for the respondents would submit that the dispute can be resolved by intervention of the Engineer-in-Chief as provided in clause 12 of terms and conditions of the contract dated 8.7.2007.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner may be allowed to raise a dispute before the Engineer-in-Chief as
provided in clause 12 of the terms and conditions of the contract dated 8.7.2007.
3. Be that as it may, the petitioner is at liberty to raise a dispute as provided in clause 12 of the contract before the Engineer-in-Chief within two weeks from today. If such a dispute is raised, the Engineer-in-Chief shall consider and decide the same expeditiously strictly in accordance with law without being influenced by the order dated 22.6.2017.
4. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition finally stands disposed of. No cost(s).
Sd/- (Sanjay K.Agrawal) Judge B/-