← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/1630/2016disposed off

Chhote Lal Gond v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2016-11-18Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 1630 of 2016

1. Chhote Lal Gond S/o Rashiv Gond Aged About 55 Years R/o Village Kulipota, Tehsil Janjgir, Dist. Janjgir Champa (Chhattisgarh)

2. Shankar S/o Rashiv Gond Aged About 66 Years R/o Village Kulipota, Tehsil Janjgir, Dist. Janjgir Champa (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary General Administration Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Dist. Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

2. Collector, Janjgir Champa, Dist. Janjgir Champa (Chhattisgarh)

3. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Janjgir, Dist. Janjgir Champa (Chhattisgarh)

4. Tahsildar, Tehsil Janjgir, Dist. Janjgir Champa (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents For Petitioners Shri Lalit Jangde, Advocate For Respondent-State Shri Rajendra Tripathi, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 18/11/2016 1.

The petitioners have preferred this writ petition for a direction to the SDO (Revenue), Janjgir to issue permanent Caste Certificate to the petitioners on the basis of fair enquiry proceedings. 2.

Documents annexed with the writ petition would not reveal that the petitioners have moved any such application before the SDO

(Revenue), Janjgir under the Chhattisgarh Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes (Regulation of Social Status Certification) Act, 2013 for issuance of permanent Caste Certificate, therefore, for the present, it is not possible to issue any direction to the concerned SDO (Revenue). 3.

At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners may be permitted to move such application before the concerned SDO (Revenue) and the said Officer be directed to decide the application at the earliest. 4.

In view of the statement made, the petitioners are permitted to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to pursue the application, if they have moved any such application, or to present fresh application before the concerned SDO (Revenue) within a period of one month from today. If such application is made, the concerned SDO (Revenue) shall decide the same, at the earliest, preferably within a period of 3 months. 5.

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with the above observation.

Sd/- JUDGE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA Nirala