High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/5237/2019disposed off

Santosh Kumar Siware v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-07-17Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5237 of 2019

1. Santosh Kumar Siware S/o Shri Ramadhar Siware, Aged About 43 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. Primary School Birejhar, Cluster Hirri, Block Dhamdha, Police Station Bori, District Durg, Chhattisgarh

2. Smt. Kalyani Nishad W/o Shri Rohit Kumar Nishad, Aged About 39 Years, Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. Primary School Birejhar, Cluster Hirri, Block Dhamdha, Police Station Bori, District Durg Chhattisgarh

3. Panna Lal Sahu S/o Shri Dashru Ram Sahu Aged About 44 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. Primary School Birejhar, Cluster Hirri, Block Dhamdha, Police Station Bori, District Durg Chhattisgarh

4. Dushyant Kumar Kumbhare S/o Shri Shiv Kumar Kumbhare, Aged About 35 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. Primary School Deurkone, Cluster Arsi, Block Dhamdha, Police Station Bori, District Durg Chhattisgarh

5. Sanjay Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Radheylal Sharma, Aged About 38 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. Primary School Funda, Block Dhamdha, Police Station Bori, District Durg Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Panchayat Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Secretary, Department Of School Education Mahanadi Bhaan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. District Education Officer, Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh

4. Block Education Officer, Block Dhamdha, District Durg, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents

For Petitioners :

Mr. O. P. Sahu, Advocate.

For State :

Mr. Chandresh Shrivastava, Dy. A.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 17/07/2019

1. The limited grievance of the petitioners is that petitioners are entitled for the benefit of Kramonnati on completing 10 years of service which they have completed but they have not been given the same till date.

2. Given the limited grievance raised, let the petitioners make detailed representation in this regard to respondents 3 & 4 who in turn shall scrutinize the same and pass a suitable order in accordance with the rules governing the field of Kramonnati. It is expected that an appropriate order shall be passed within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of representation of the petitioners.

3. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Khatai