← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/2335/2018dismissed

Fatte Lal Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-08-20Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 2248 of 2018 • Smt. Kamla Bai W/o Late Shri Devi Lal Aged About 60 Years R/o Kundani, Tehsil Gurur, District Balod, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of CoOperative Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. State Co-Operative Election Commission Of Chhattisgarh, Through Commissioner, Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Joint Registrar and Coordinator Co-Operative Societies, Durg Division, District Durg, Chhattisgarh

4. Registration Officer, Denteshwari Maiya Co-Operative Sugar Mill Maryadit, Registration Number 145, Balod, District Balod, Chhattisgarh

5. Collector, District Balod, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent WPC No. 2335 of 2018 • Fatte Lal Sahu, S/o Shri Naina Singh Sahu, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Baretara, Block Balod, District Balod, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of CoOperative Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. State Co- Operative Election Commission Of Chhattisgarh, Through Commissioner, Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Joint Registrar and Coordinator Co-Operative Societies, Durg Division, District Durg, Chhattisgarh

4. Registration Officer, Danteshwari Maiya Co- Operative Sugar Mill Maryadit, Registration Number, 145, Balod, District Balod, Chhattisgarh

5. Collector, District Balod, Chhattisgarh

---- Respondents For Petitioners Shri M. K. Mishra, Advocate For Respondent-State Shri A. S. Kachhawaha, Addl. AG Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 20/08/2018 1.

In view of the provision contained in sub-section (14) of Section 77 of the Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petitions with liberty to avail the remedy of revision before the Chhattisgarh Cooperative Tribunal.

2.

Prayer allowed.

3.

Accordingly, the writ petitions are dismissed with liberty to avail the remedy of preferring revision before the Tribunal. Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge Nirala