Vinay Kumar Gupta v. State Trasport Authority And ANR.
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
WWW WWW mwwmwWmxh'mWWM'wwmw u W musm m mmwmu mm WWW EILA$PUR (C.€v.) &R Cb?'
'iik "
2 r of gol'igijw , '
Q W'P- (C) No.
S PETITIONER Vinny Kumar Gup'm, aged abou'r 37 years S/o Lafe Kapil Prasad Cyggw\'\ Gup'ra R/o Village Tapkar'a f7 @m;\\\\ Farsabahar Dis'r'i' J'ashpur (CG) /,?/ VER5U$ REsPONDENT$ :1 5mm Transpor'r Aufhorh'y, Raipur, Pandri, New Bus Sfcmd Raipur (C.G.) 2.
Mohd' Yums Khan, s/o LaTe Sher Mohd., M/s Pm'han Travels, Properiwr, Mohd.
Yunus Khan, V We Imlipam, Ambikapur Dish'.
Surguja (6.6.) WRIT PEW'FImN UNDER ARWmE 226 OF THE £30N5TITUTIQN OF INDIA
WWW W /....%=L«201~» mm:iwm .
asmnm B. Hon'ble shri'Justice Pras'
S ha Kumar Mishr t a '
23.12.2014 Shri Santosh Gupta, coun el for the petitioner.
Shri Ajit Singh Pane! Law er forthe State Learned counsel for the p tmoner seeks permiSSIon of the Court to Withdraw the wnt pet n Wtth hberty to file an appeal m against the'impugned order.
Permission granted, Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn wit h L "s/- the aforesaid liberty.
d Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge