High Court Of ChhattisgarhMCC/585/2016allowed

Smt. Durga Yadav v. Smt. Sushila Bai Chandrakar

2016-08-16Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCC No. 585 of 2016 • Smt. Durga Yadav W/o Shri Hare Ram Yadav, Aged About 22 Years R/o Village Tarvarpur, Gram Panchayat, Tarvrpur, Janpad Panchayat, Mungeli, Thana & Tahsil Mungeli, Revenue District Mungeli, Civil District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh (Age Wrongly Mentioned As 19 Years In Election Petition) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. Smt. Sushila Bai Chandrakar W/o Shri Dewaram Chandrakar, Aged About 36 Years By Caste Kurmi, R/o Village Tarvarpur, Gram Panchayat, Tarvarpur, Janpad Panchayat, Mungeli, Thana & Tahsil Mungeli, Revenue District Mungeli, Civil District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

2. Smt. Kanti Bai Yadav W/o Ramsingh Yadav, Aged About 55 Years R/o Village Udka, Gram Panchayat, Tarvarpur, Janpad Panchayat, Mungeli, Thana & Tahsil Mungeli, Revenue District Mungeli, Civil District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

3. Smt Sulakshana W/o Suresh, Aged About 20 Years By Caste Satnami, R/o Village Thakurkapa, Gram Panchayat, Tarvarpur, Janpad Panchayat, Mungeli, Thana & Tahsil Mungeli, Revenue District Mungeli, Civil District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

4. Presiding Officer, Poling Booth No. 95, Tarvarpur, Through TahsildarCum-Assistant Returning Officer, Mungeli, District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh

5. Presiding Officer, Polling Booth No. 96, Village Udka, Gram Panchayat, Tarvarpur, Through Tahsildar-Cum-Assistant Returning Officer, Mungeli, District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh

6. Returning Officer, Panchayat Election, Janpad Panchayat, Mungeli, Through Collector, Mungeli, District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent For Applicant Shri R. S. Baghel, Advocate For Respondent-State Shri Avinash Singh, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board By

16/08/2016 I.A. No.1 This is an application for condonation of delay in filing the restoration application.

It is ordered, as prayed for.

M.C.C. No.585/2016 This is an application for restoration of WPC No.53/2016, which was dismissed for want of prosecution pursuant to the order dated 12.01.2016. On due consideration and for the reasons mentioned in the restoration application, it is allowed and WPC No.53/2016 is directed to be restored to its original number.

Sd/- JUDGE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA Nirala