Sushil Kumar Rathore v. State Of Chhattisgarh
AFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 4829 of 2018 Sushil Kumar Rathore S/o Shri Rajendra Singh Rathore, Aged About 28 Years Working As Daily Wager Employee, Resident Of Village Bandhamuda, Ward No. 14, Nagar Panchayat, Gourela, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.
---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Urban Administration And Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
2. The Director, Directorate Of Urban Administration And Development, Mantralaya, New Raipur Chhattisgarh.
3. The Joint Director, Directorate Of Urban Administration And Development, Mantralaya, New Raipur Chhattisgarh.
4. The Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Gourela, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondents For the Petitioner :
Shri R.S. Baghel, Advocate For the State :
Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta Order On Board /07/2018
1. Heard counsel for the parties.
2. The petitioner was employee of Nagar Panchayat, Gourela seeking a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization according to the policy of the Government.
3. Learned State counsel submits that regularization can be claimed only in accordance with the policy of regularization in force and the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Secretary, State of Karnataka and others V. Uma Devi (3) and others, (2006) 4 SCC 1.
4. Considering the submission and after going through the pleadings and document on record. It would be expedient in the
interest of justice to dispose off this petition with a direction to respondent No. 4 to take appropriate decision to consider the claim of the petitioner and take final decision thereon within a period of four months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. In case, the matter is required for approval or sanction of the higher authority, the same shall also be expedited.
5. This Court has not touched the merits of the case. Sd/- (Sharad Kumar Gupta) Judge Kamde